New website allows users to compare and rate blade servers
Sydney, Australia based-Ideas International Inc. has launched an open source-style website to compare and rate the functional capabilities of blade servers on Monday, April 7.
The IT research and analysis company’s new site for Collaborative Product Evaluation looks at medium-sized blade servers and will include enterprise-level blade server data by mid-summer, said Jim Burton, the vice president and senior analyst for entry-level servers and blades at Ideas International.
The site lets users compare various components of the servers that fall under the umbrellas of platform functionality, environmental footprint, virtualization functions, reliability, serviceability and manageability, and deployment considerations.
The information is based on the hardware specifications, interviews with end users, and performance data, Burton said.
“We establish the appropriate ratings, but it is an open source-style website, so users can affect these ratings too,” Burton said. Of course, Ideas International give the user feedback a credibility rating, so only statements supported by concrete data can actually bring a rating up or down, he said.
The site is pretty handy if you are on the market for blade servers, especially because the site allows you to make comparisons based on your priorities. If you need power efficiency, you can compare boxes based on that alone. Same goes for factors like “green-ness,” cost, networking and so forth, said Burton.
Ideas International also has evaluation sites for x86 virtual machine platforms and plans to create evaluation sites for Unix-based systems and Linux in the near future, so keep an eye out for those.
Posted: April 3rd, 2008 under Uncategorized, Data center physical infrastructure, Unix operating systems and servers, Blade servers, Enterprise Linux, Hardware and Performance monitoring, Capacity planning, Server virtualization in the data center, Data center standards and metrics, x86 servers, Green data center.
The author is incorrect in stating that the c3000 has no failure prediction capabilities. Mine has all the same failure prediction capabilities that every ProLiant server has had for years. With the LCD on the front of the enclosure I can plainly see what’s going wrong in words and pictures, instead of trying to decipher some blinking lights like you have to in IBM’s products.
Comment by Blade Guy — April 4, 2008 @ 6:35 am
[…] We talked about blade servers this week with Blade Watch’s Martin MacLeod, and at the same time saw this report from the Server Specs blog which points us to a website that allows users to compare and rate blade servers. Launching on Monday, the site lets users compare various components of the servers that fall under the umbrellas of platform functionality, environmental footprint, virtualization functions, reliability, serviceability and manageability, and deployment considerations. […]
Pingback by Links List 4.4.08 | IT's About Uptime - The StackSafe Blog — April 4, 2008 @ 9:46 am